Remembering Mori

By Wayne Pennington

On July 1st of this year (2023) Morijiro Shibayama, long time JALT member and Gunma Chapter founding co-president passed away. Some of you may not have had the privilege of knowing Mori at all, others may only have a slight recollection of the mild-mannered elderly gentleman who so dedicatedly attended the monthly JALT-Gunma meetings prior to the outbreak of Covid 19, but during his fulfilling life of 87 years encompassing a teaching career spanning more than 60 years of teaching at high school, kosen, junior college, and university, he was a special person for a lot of different people in many different ways. I myself, am one of them. Perhaps you are, too.

I think it is appropriate at this time to remember Mori by remembering his contribution to JALT and especially to JALT-Gunma. The chapter would not have been founded and founded so successfully without his many contributions. As the other founding co-president, I’m afraid I cannot avoid inserting myself into the narration. I beg your indulgence. Mori acted as my go-between allowing me to come to Gunma in 1983. When I took up my new position in Maebashi, Mori also gave me a chance to help out at his workplace, the now defunct College of Medical Care and Technology, Gunma University. I worked with him there every Monday teaching nursing and medical technology students. During our weekly encounters, we soon began to toy with the idea of starting our own JALT chapter as the nearest chapters at the time were Omiya and Tokyo, and the few JALT members who lived in Gunma were categorized as Tokyo members though we could seldom attend their monthly meetings. 

We were enthusiastic about making a chapter as soon as possible but our planning was delayed when Mori was given a chance to study in the US for a year in 1985. While he was away, I started the groundwork for forming our new chapter by contacting JALT National, going to special chapter formation meetings, doing the paperwork and getting things in motion. When Mori got back in June of 1986, we were ready to begin. The liaison with Tokyo Chapter and JALT National was complete.

Relying on Mori’s wide range of personal and professional contacts, we quickly put together a core group of interested teachers to plan a kickoff meeting. We enlisted the help of a lot of enthusiastic teachers who later became our first affiliate officers, and in September, under the kind sponsorship of the Tokyo Chapter, we successfully held our kick-off meeting at Kyoai Girl’s High School in Maebashi. At this meeting we successfully recruited many new JALT members and shortly thereafter, held a business meeting and confirmed a slate of officers. We were ready to take the first step in chapter formation by applying to JALT National as an affiliate. Eventually, the Gunma Affiliate was confirmed. By then we were off to a very good start and in due course, and after meeting all of the minimum requirements, our affiliate was approved as a chapter. Of course, this didn’t happen overnight. It’s actually quite a lengthy process.

For brevity’s sake I have made it sound very simple, but in reality, it was not. These were pre-internet times. Communication was done by snail mail, telephone and fax. Speakers had to be found and recruited – a difficult process with no internet. Venues had to be found, especially ones that were cheap or free. Then monthly announcements had to be sent out to newspapers and language teaching journals, lists of prospective attendees had to be compiled and announcement post cards had to be printed and mailed out to them. It was labor intensive and a great deal of work for the officers who were already too busy teachers.

But in short time, the Gunma Chapter became the envy of all small JALT chapters. Where chapters in areas with much larger populations were often struggling to keep enough members and having to double up to fill out their slate of officers, Gunma Chapter soon had around one hundred members and almost 20 officers including positions that no other chapter could boast. At national meetings, we were often asked how we did it. We were happy to share our success. The key was sharing and networking. 

From the outset, we wanted our chapter to be different from other JALT chapters at the time. We wanted to be inclusive. Inclusive in terms of languages taught, teaching situations and teacher nationality. Everyone was welcome and we often had visitors who weren’t teachers at all. Our main goal was to create opportunities for all language teachers at all levels to interact, to share and learn from each other and simply enjoy being together. 

Another aspect of sharing was to share the workload. We realized that if we could share the duties and responsibilities of being an officer among several people then it would be much easier to get people to volunteer. We had two officers in every position and sometimes more. It worked very well. 

The other key was networking. We made our meetings and our organization a very social event. We had three or four social officers who worked very hard to make the monthly meetings quite enjoyable. Coffee breaks sometimes lasted 30 minutes. Social officers also organized excellent Christmas parties and other social events for our members to enjoy throughout the year. But their greatest task was the annual summer workshop at Kusatsu where they provided social activities, refreshments, and took care of accompanying family members – including JALT-kids – so that their JALT-Gunma member parent could enjoy the 3-day workshop featuring well-known language teaching specialists as well as local chapter member presentations. 

The highlight of the Gunma Chapter was the Kusatsu Summer Workshop which was Mori’s brainchild. Being on the faculty of Gunma University made it possible for him to secure the use of the Kusatsu Seminar House for a large group of people at a reasonable cost. Every year, through the efforts of both Mori and especially Prof. Hisatake Jimbo, we were able to host internationally renowned speakers, enjoy their lectures, have campfire discussions over a friendly drink, and even share a relaxing dip in a world-famous hot spring. These were special times for all of us but especially for our overworked members and even their families.

I cannot list all of Mori’s contributions to our chapter but by far his greatest and most difficult task was hosting the JALT International Conference at Maebashi Green Dome in 1999. Yes, we rented the Green Dome for five days, built booths and partitions throughout the otherwise open areas, borrowed tons of AV equipment from local schools and universities, hired caterers and arranged for parties, booked hundreds of hotel rooms for participants, and enlisted the help of almost every JALT-Gunma member and even people who weren’t members. We had a very successful conference and once again it was due to Mori’s leadership as conference chair, his eagerness and enthusiasm, his ability to network and involve people and his ability to get the job done.

I have listed only a few of Mori’s most memorable contributions to the chapter. In no way do I wish to imply that he did it all by himself. The Gunma Chapter of today is the result of the concerted effort and constant dedication of so many people over the years. Each of their contributions have been valuable and resulted in the quality of the chapter we have today. But I think it is fair to say that without Mori’s leadership, the Gunma Chapter would not have been founded when it was, would not have grown and prospered as it did and perhaps would not have continued, as has been the case of other small local chapters. So, as we start our 38th year, let us remember Mori and all those who worked hard to make this all possible.

 

A comparative review of two studies on learner motivational strategies

By Sylvain Bergeron

This comparative review will analyze the research methods and findings of two separate and well-referenced articles that examine the effects of teachers’ motivational strategies on student motivation. These two studies refer specifically to Guilloteaux & Dörnyei (2008) “Motivating language learners: A classroom‐oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation,” and Moskovsky et al., (2013) “The effects of teachers’ motivational strategies on learners’ motivation: A controlled investigation of second language acquisition.” Although they share the same subject of inquiry, the reader will find that both articles describe methods and conclusions that are unique to each one.  

In order to provide the reader with an overview of how both articles will be reviewed, the following points will be considered:

  1. quality of the source 
  2. focus of the researchers’ work
  3. earlier studies
  4. appropriateness of the research design 
  5. appropriateness of the methodological decisions
  6. personal observations

Finally, at the conclusion of this review, in a compare-and-contrast fashion, both articles will be measured against each other to highlight and assess the strengths and weaknesses of key methodological decisions that were made during the course of these two separate investigations.  

Review of article one 

The first article to be reviewed is Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). “Motivating language learners: A classroom‐oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation.”  

Quality of the source

As I evaluate the quality of the source in which the Guilloteaux and Dörnyei article appears, I find that it has been published in a journal that is well established and of solid reputation within the field of English language education.  Known as the TESOL Quarterly, (TESOL: Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages) this journal is described as “a professional, peer-reviewed publication, which has been in existence for nearly sixty years” (TESOL Quarterly, 2023).  In addition, this journal appears on reputable academic and scientific databases intended for both scholars and students conducting research in the area of English as a second/foreign language (ESL/EFL).  

Focus of the researchers’ work

Guilloteaux and Dörnyei’s investigation (2008, p. 55) was initiated by the desire to provide an answer to a commonly held belief within the field of English language teaching (ELT) that “a teacher’s motivational strategies have a direct influence on students’ motivation in the L2 classroom” (p. 55).  

Earlier studies

Despite the fact that earlier studies by Gardner & Tremblay (1994); Dörnyei & Csizér (1998); Chen, Warden & Chang (2005); and Cheng & Dörnyei (2007) strongly encouraged the idea of turning motivational theories into practice, they failed to provide more objective data based on the types of motivational strategies being implemented by L2 teachers and how in turn, these strategies consequently influenced their students’ level of participation.  In response to this problem, Guilloteaux and Dörnyei (2008) set out to improve on what had so far been attempted by experimenting with a newer, broader, and more inclusive research design (p. 57).

Appropriateness of research design 

In their effort to answer whether or not L2 teachers’ motivational practice influences “students’ motivated levels of learning and their motivational state” (p. 56), Guilloteaux and Dörnyei felt that it was crucial for their investigation to adopt a new research design that would allow them to replace the typical self-report questionnaires with a more encompassing tool (questionnaire) for classroom observation and assessment known as the “Motivation Orientation of Language Teaching” (MOLT) (p. 76).  

Guided by an earlier model known as “Communication Orientation of Language Teaching” (COLT); introduced by Spada and Fröhlich (1995), Guilloteaux and Dörnyei’s newer research design proved to be appropriate for their research question, as MOLT significantly improved on the COLT system of classroom observation.  Essentially, MOLT is a questionnaire designed to measure a teacher’s motivational practice based on the following criteria: teacher discourse, student participation structure (use of pair and group work), activity design, encouraging positive retrospective self-evaluation, and learners’ motivated behavior (p.76). In brief, the MOLT questionnaire made it possible to: 1) move beyond the singular use of teacher-centered, self-report questionnaires, 2) assess teachers’ in-class motivational practice and 3) evaluate the students’ level of motivated behavior in areas pertaining to “attention, engagement, and volunteering” (p. 57). All of these factors combined helped to make the observation and evaluation process more empirically valid, encompassing, and inclusive. 

Appropriateness of methodological decisions

As Guilloteaux and Dörnyei’s investigation consisted of “a large-scale study involving 40 South Korean EFL classrooms, more than 1,300 [junior high school] students and 27 teachers” (p. 55), the researchers had to adequately meet the organizational, logistical, and statistical and analytical demands required by a project of this magnitude.  Keeping in mind that only a minimal amount of research had been conducted in this area before, the researchers made methodological decisions relating to participant recruitment, data sources, and data collection tools that were both novel and innovative at the time. 

In relation to participant recruitment and the selection process involved, it was clear to see that the researchers had given careful attention to cultural and educational sensitivities by not selecting third-year junior high school students (p. 61), who like their Japanese counterparts, must prepare to sit the rigorous high school entrance exams at the close of their third year of junior high school.

Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the methodological decisions made by Guilloteaux and Dörnyei (2008) throughout this study were appropriate, clear, and well-focused enabling them to best obtain the necessary data and answer their research question. 

Personal observations 

After close examination of the research design, methodological decisions, and the findings that were made, I find myself in agreement with the interpretation of Guilloteaux and Dörnyei’s results. Considering that the main purpose of their study involved the need to fill a crucial gap by obtaining “observational classroom data” (p. 72) in an area of study that had, from the start according to Gardner and Tremblay (1994), very little empirical evidence to show for, both researchers were successful at answering their research question. At the same time, they made a much-needed contribution to the body of knowledge associated with this area of inquiry: motivational strategies. In the end, I am satisfied with the findings presented in this study.  The results are convincing and solidly support the hypothesis that teachers’ motivational strategies do in fact influence the motivation and behavior of students.

Review of article two

The second article to be reviewed is Moskovsky, C., Alrabai, F., Paolini, S., & Ratcheva, S. (2012). “The effects of teachers’ motivational strategies on learners’ motivation: A controlled investigation of second language acquisition.”  

Quality of the source

In examining the quality of the source in which this article appears, I realize that it was indeed published in a reliable and reputable academic/scientific journal.  Known as “Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies,” this academic journal which focuses on fundamental theoretical issues in language learning is a peer-reviewed publication that is accessible via a reputable academic database, the Wiley Online Library. Of solid reputation, the Wiley Online Library, in which the journal appears, specializes in the international publication of journal articles and books associated with the scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly fields.  

Focus of the researchers’ work

Aware of the significant place that motivation and motivational strategies occupy in the field of second language (SL) education, researchers Moskovsky, Alrabai, Paolini, and  Ratcheva (henceforth referred to as Moskovsky et al.,) have concentrated their research efforts to investigate and provide an answer to a field-related question that asks how “the implementation of motivational strategies within the context of the L2 classroom can bring about positive change in learners’ attitude and motivation towards attaining a non-primary language such as English” (p. 57).  

Earlier studies

Spearheaded by the work of Gardner and Tremblay (1994), other research studies cited in in the Moskovsky et al., article includes the work of well-known authority figures in the field of English language education and in the area of motivation and motivational studies. These include well-respected researchers and educators – and their work – such as Dörnyei & Csizér (1998); Wlodkowski (1999); Cheng & Dörnyei (2007); and Guilloteaux & Dörnyei (2008).  

Appropriateness of research design 

Making use of a quasi-experimental design, Moskovsky et al., aimed to take their research on motivational strategies to a level that had not yet been achieved by earlier studies. In quasi-experimental design, unlike an experimental design, participants are not randomly assigned. Participants are instead assigned to groups that are based on non-random indicators (Kervin et al., 2006, p. 65). Moskovsky et al., (2013) went the extra distance to create a research design composed of data collection and statistical and analytical analyses instruments (i.e., control group, matching procedures, and assessment) (p. 57), that would guarantee the production of “stringent and unequivocal results” (Moskovsky et al., 

2013, p. 57).

In this author’s opinion, this model was appropriate to their chosen research design as the researchers were intent on answering their research question by making use of the most empirically effective methodology. Confident of their success and in their ability to prove and support their research question, the researchers felt that they had “most appropriately responded to Gardner and Tremblay’s (1994) call for empirical tests in the language classroom; in a way that had yet to be replicated” (p. 57). 

Appropriateness of methodological decisions

This eight-week quasi-experimental study involved 14 Saudi English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instructors and 296 male Saudi students from various high schools, technical institutions, and universities, located in different regions of Saudi Arabia (p. 34).  In regard to the methodological decisions relating to data sources and data collection instruments used to statistically/analytically document the results of their study, Moskovsky et al., (2013) made appropriate methodological decisions as can be seen by the meticulous attention given to the statistical/analytical components of their study.

Personal observations 

Had I been one of the members of the research team, I would have proposed to include a more diverse and demographically representative group of students that included both male and female EFL learners. Failing to do so, ultimately excludes a significant sample of the population, which in turn, negatively impacts the findings of the research. Furthermore, from an educational perspective, if the ultimate goal is to improve and build upon already existing practices, then, in this author’s opinion, the research effort should be more fully encompassing, diverse, and inclusive overall. Doing so, as in this case, would have provided a valuable opportunity to observe, evaluate, and document the response and level of motivation – or even perhaps demotivation – experienced by female Saudi students in contrast to their male counterparts. Finally, this type of research endeavor would have created an important opportunity to present additional findings and at the same time, provide much needed data for this particular area of language education research. In all fairness to Moskovsky and al., although this question goes beyond the scope of this paper, it may prove extremely insightful to one day revisit the approach and methodology employed by the research team in order to understand why certain decisions were made in regard to their sample selection that led to the inclusion of a certain participant group (or demographic) and not of the other.  

Conclusion

When comparing the two articles, I find that both focused on the same subject area and both attempted to answer the same research question based on Gardner and Tremblay’s (1994) recommendation to turn theories into practice by implementing motivational strategies within the context of the L2 classroom.  Furthermore, I find that both articles tried to improve both the approach and methodology that had been attempted in earlier studies (Gardner & Tremblay (1994); Dörnyei & Csizér (1998); Chen, Warden & Chang (2005); Cheng & Dörnyei (2007) despite the limited amount of empirical data available.  

As the study of motivational strategies proved to be a field that had yet to be more fully investigated, this provided both groups of researchers (Guilloteaux and Dörnyei (2008); Moskovsky et al., (2013) with an opportunity to innovate by taking the research and its newest findings to the next level.  In regard to participant recruitment, selection, data sources, and collection, both studies excelled by introducing new and improved procedures of observation and assessment in order to empirically answer their research question, while at the same time accumulating and contributing a body of much needed field-related knowledge and scientifically supported evidence.  Finally, both studies presented open-ended conclusions with far-reaching theoretical and practical implications. 

In contrast, when I differentiate between the strengths and weaknesses of key methodological decisions that were made in both studies, I find that the methodological decision taken by Guilloteaux and Dörnyei (2008) to make use of an experimental design as opposed to a quasi-experimental design, which was the case with the Moskovsky et al., (2013) was, in this author’s opinion, much more appropriate, as it allowed for a greater amount of flexibility, freedom, and diversity in key areas such as methodological design, statistical and analytical analyses, and student and participant demographics.  

The methodological decision by researchers Guilloteaux and Dörnyei (2008) to make use of a ‘snowball sampling’ procedure to recruit participants/students from one institution to another through the cooperation and coordination of several academic institutions situated within one specific region of the country (South Korea) greatly contributed to making this study unpredictably fluid, random, and varied. In contrast, the decision to employ a more controlled methodology by way of a quasi-experimental research design prevented the Moskovsky et al., study (2013) research team from experiencing the kind of randomness, liberty, and diversity that their counterparts had experienced. 

Despite their differences in approach and procedure, both research teams need to be recognized for having had the courage to take on a subject of inquiry that many other researchers were reluctant to undertake due to “the extremely labor-intensive demands and extensive classroom observations associated with validation studies” (Guilloteaux and Dörnyei, 2008, p. 56). Again, regardless of their differences in approach and methodology, both research groups were ultimately successful at proving and empirically validating a research question that was common, significant, and crucial to them as L2 language researchers and educators and just as importantly, to the field at large. 

References

Chen, J.F., Warden, C.A., & Chang, H.T. (2005). Motivators that do not motivate: The case of Chinese EFL learners and the influence of culture on motivation. TESOL Quarterly, vol. 39, 609-633.

Cheng, H.F., & Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan’, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, vol. 1, 153-174.

Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (1998). Ten commandments for motivating language learners. Results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, vol. 2, 203-229.

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the foreign language classroom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 31.

Farrell, T.S.C. (2014). Promoting teacher reflection in second language education. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd. 

Gardner, R.C., & Tremblay, P.F. (1994). On motivation, research agendas and theoretical frameworks. Modern Language Journal, vol. 78, 359-368. 

Guilloteaux, M.J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom‐oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00207.x

Kervin, L.K. et al., (2006). Research for educators, South Melbourne, Vic.: Thomson Social Science Press. 

Moskovsky, C., Alrabai, F., Paolini, S., & Ratcheva, S. (2012). The effects of teachers’ motivational strategies on learners’ motivation: A controlled investigation of second language acquisition. Language Learning. 63(1), 34–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-9922.2012.00717.x 

Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). COLT Communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications, Macquarie University, National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Sydney.

Wlodkowski, R. (1999). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Teaching presentation skills to Japanese high school students

By David S. Andrews

Presentations can differ greatly in both design and delivery depending on the culture in which they are given. Having worked for many years in a large corporation in Japan, I have sat through more than my fair share of Japanese presentations where the presenter monotonously reads everything from slides that are crammed full of information. According to several graduate students who took my course on presentation, this type of design and delivery tends to be expected by the Japanese audience and sometimes preferred by the Japanese presenter. For most Western audiences, however, this presentation method often leaves the audience bored and wondering if the role of the presenter is simply to read aloud to the audience while they read the same information. So, when I was asked by a high school here in Gunma to give a 90-minute open lecture on how to give a presentation in English, I thought it would be the perfect opportunity to introduce the Western concept of presentation to the younger generation. To this end, I devised a lesson plan designed to be not only informative, but also engaging and easy to understand, and which would hopefully leave the students with a sense of accomplishment.

The lecture was given entirely in English as the high school was well known for its students’ high level of English. A total of 16 students attended the lecture, and while there was some difference in proficiency among the students, all expressed a desire to learn in English. Many were members of the high-school debate team and were able to express themselves in English quite clearly. All said that they had never given a presentation in English before and only one said they had given a presentation in Japanese.

In my experience, students tend to be most receptive to learning when they are comfortable with the teacher and the tasks are fun and engaging. So, instead of giving a traditional teacher self-introduction, groups of four students were asked to make a list of five questions they could ask in order to get to know me. One by one, students asked their questions. When possible, students were encouraged to try and guess the answers. This Q&A-type self-introduction not only actively engaged the students, but also enabled them to get to know me on their terms, and this seemed to make them more comfortable with me. It also enabled me to assess their English ability before the class began. Although the activity took longer than a typical self-introduction, I felt the benefits it offered were well worth it.

In order to ascertain whether the students knew the characteristics of a good presentation, they were asked to critique two short, single-slide presentations given by me using a projector and a pointer. The first presentation was intentionally full of faux pas such as reading from the script, speaking in a monotone voice, not making any eye contact, fidgeting, and the incorrect use of the pointer. Also, the slide had a small graph on one side and multiple whole sentences in small text describing the graph on the other. The second presentation omitted the previous presentation’s mistakes and used a slide with the same graph, only enlarged, and without all of the sentences. The students were given several minutes to discuss in groups and report their findings to the class. By having students compare two polar opposite demonstrations, it was hoped that they would be able to more easily identify the differences between the two presentations. The results were positive as the students were able to describe almost all of the differences. Of particular interest is that they described the characteristics of the first presentation as negative and the characteristics of the second presentation as positive quite intuitively, before the lecture had even begun.

After the demonstrations, the important points to consider when giving a presentation – voice modulation, pauses, line-of-sight, posture, gestures, body position and movement, the correct use of a pointer, etc. – were then explained and demonstrated. The role of visual aids and the do’s and don’ts when preparing slides were also explained with actual slides to illustrate the points.

Next, the students were taught several common phrases often used when describing graphs, which they practiced and memorized. Each group was then given four different laminated A3 size graphs, one for each student, that were equally simple and straightforward. Students were given five minutes to think about how they were going to describe their graph using some of the phrases they had learned while keeping in mind the presentation points we had covered. They were allowed to write down notes but not complete sentences. Then, one student from each group stood up and presented the A3 size graph to their group. They were given a 90-second time limit. The other three students then pointed out what they thought the presenter had done well and what they thought could be improved. After each of the students had taken a turn, the class as a whole discussed how they felt they did and possible ways to improve. Giving each of the students the opportunity to present enabled them to put into practice what they had learned. Large audiences can often be intimidating, so by having the students give their presentations in front of only a few of their peers, the hope was that they would be less nervous and could therefore perform better than they might in front of the whole class.

For the final part of the lesson, one volunteer from each group gave their presentation in front of the entire class using a projector and pointer. The volunteers were given five minutes to consult with their groups and prepare. Again, the volunteers were allowed to write down notes but not entire sentences. The slide each volunteer used was the same slide they had used in their presentation for their group, and they were given the same 90-second time limit. After each volunteer gave their presentation, the students in the audience were asked to give their impressions. Only favorable comments were given in order to keep the experience positive. At that time, I also added a positive comment about their presentation. I gave my overall impressions after all four of the volunteers had finished their presentations so as not to make any of the volunteers feel like they were being singled out.

From watching their presentations, it was evident the volunteers had made a conscious effort to incorporate the important points that had been covered in the lecture. They also correctly used the phrases they had been taught. What is more, only one of the four students used notes but did so carefully, heeding the advice given during the lecture.

At the end of the lecture, the students were asked to fill out a short questionnaire regarding the lecture. One response was in English and the rest were in Japanese. The feedback was overwhelmingly positive. Of the 16 students, 14 responded that it was very easy to understand. Among the reasons cited were that the important points were taught through demonstration using simple English, gestures, and body language. Also, when more difficult English was used, it was accompanied by gestures and restated in simple English. They also commented that they enjoyed the use of humor. Two students responded that the lecture was somewhat difficult to understand. One cited that they had difficulty catching and understanding some of the English, and the other cited their own lack of English skills.

After the lecture, several students came up to me to chat in English. One started off thanking me for giving a lecture at their school and expressing how much he had learned. The students’ presentation results and comments confirmed to me that the lecture was a success. It is my sincere hope that the skills they learned from the lecture will contribute in some way to their own success if they ever find themselves giving a presentation in English. They may even go so far as to apply these skills to Japanese presentations as well. 

Lesson plan

Class type: Presentation Skills
Class size and Level: 16 students; Intermediate
Materials used: Laminated A3 size graphs (4 each of 4 different graphs), projector, PowerPoint slides, pointer

TimeAimActivities
10mWarmup and T self-introduction To relieve Ss’ anxiety, engage Ss, and assess Ss’ English abilityPut Ss in groups of four. Tell Ss to make a list of five questions they want to ask me to get to know me. Have groups ask one question at a time. Have Ss guess the answers when possible.
10mTo ascertain whether Ss know the characteristics of a good presentationGive a short demonstration of a bad presentation. Give a short demonstration of a good presentation. Tell Ss to discuss and report findings to the class.
20mTo teach and demonstrate the characteristics of a good presentationExplain and demonstrate important points to consider when giving a presentation (e.g., voice modulation, pauses, line-of-sight, posture, gestures, body position and movement, the correct use of a pointer, do’s and don’ts when preparing slides).
20mTo teach and have Ss practice and memorize common phrases used when describing graphsTeach Ss common phrases they will use (e.g., “This graph shows…,” “The vertical axis represents…,” “The horizontal axis represents…,” “As you can see in the graph, …,” “In conclusion, …”). Show a slide of phrases with some words blacked out and have Ss fill in the blanks orally.
15mTo have Ss practice what they have learned in a non-threatening environmentGive each group four different A3 size graphs, one for each S. Have Ss think about what they will say about their graph. (5m) Have Ss present to their groups. (90s each) Discuss as a class how Ss thought they did.
15mConsolidation
To have Ss demonstrate what they learned and give Ss confidence
Have one volunteer from each group present to the class. (90s each) Have Ss give impressions (positive comments only). Give T’s impressions (positive comments only).
T = Teacher  S/Ss = Student/Students

 

My Next iPod: What is next after the Four Skills?

By John Larson

Introduction

The following is a thought experiment. In it, two unrelated models are compared primarily because of their aesthetic similarity. They are compared in the hopes of producing novel ideas about the artificial structures teachers and learners use to understand language use. As it is a thought experiment, readers are encouraged to read this with an open mind. 

A simple quadrant

ESL curricula and materials have long been dominated by a simple quadrant:

 These, of course, are the Four Skills. The Four Skills may not officially need to be capitalized as they are in this article, but they hold such sway over English language learning, and have done so for such a long time, that they warrant due regard.

“four skills” “the four skills” graph from Google Books Ngram Viewer – http://books.google.com/ngrams

As we can see in Ngram viewer from Google Books, scholarship on the Four Skills can be seen emerging as early as the late 1800s. Perhaps one of the first conceptualizations of the Four Skills was by Claude Marcel in 1853. Instead of using the term skills, he referred to them as branches, but the idea is unchanged. Marcel first divided language use between what he calls impression and expression, and then further subdivided these between spoken and written language, giving rise to Marcel’s four branches of language study: reading, hearing, speaking, and writing (Marcel, 1853). Marcel used this division to argue that reading should have primacy in adult language teaching and be taught above all the other skills. This process – dividing language use into the Four Skills in order to emphasize one or two as crucial or more important than the rest – continues throughout language teaching history. For example, according to the standard model of ELT put forward by Hornby and others in the 1940s and 50s, the first of seven principles is, “All four language skills (listening, speaking, reading, and writing) should be taught but the spoken skill should be given priority” (Howatt & Widdowson, 1984/2009). Later in 1978, Widdowson’s own Teaching Language as Communication begins by examining the Four Skills only to reintegrate them into a holistic communicative methodology. It is fascinating, and perhaps aggravating, to have three different researchers in three different time periods using the same division of skills to support three different conclusions about the right way to teach foreign languages. On the one hand, it is good to have a versatile tool. On the other, if such a tool can be utilized to produce such different theories, it is questionable whether it is truly helpful or not. Nonetheless, the Four Skills are pervasive in seemingly every part of language learning methodology.  

Another simple quadrant

The Four Skills quadrant is reminiscent of the product lineup of Apple Inc. after Steve Job’s return as CEO. As co-founder of perhaps the most famous and successful company of all time, Jobs is almost synonymous with Apple. However, in 1985, due to a clash in managerial styles, he was stripped of all duties by then CEO John Scully and Apple’s board of directors. Jobs left Apple soon after and spent the next ten years as an entrepreneur, starting a rival computer company called NeXT, as well as helping to launch Pixar Animation Studios. Meanwhile after a series of missteps, the Apple of 1996 was facing bankruptcy. It acquired NeXT, which brought Jobs back to Apple. Within a year, Jobs was Apple’s CEO. Once he was in control again, one of the reforms he enacted was axing over two thirds of Apple’s product lines and reorganizing the remaining computers into a familiar-looking two-by-two grid:

 There are obvious economic reasons that induce companies to simplify, cost-cutting for example. However, Job’s decision had strategic benefits as well. The two benefits that concern us here as language teachers are focus and choice. 

Focus

By focusing on just four products, Apple was able to devote more research and manpower into developing fewer, more polished machines. It also speeded iteration by allowing one team to put the finishing touches on the current year’s model while another team started work on the next year’s model (Jobs, 1997). This system allowed subsequent generations of these four computers to be introduced with unique and elegant designs. They were enhanced with colored accents, were made from unconventional materials, and they soon became iconic and desirable amid a sea of beige plastic boxes.

In the same way, sectioning off English into four skills helps researchers, teachers, and students alike focus on a particular skill in a particular course, or in a particular class, or during a particular activity. The researchers in the first section of this article all used the Four Skills model as a tool to sharpen their disparate arguments. Teachers leading a listening activity might feel less of a need to point out grammar errors in students’ responses. Students in a writing class may feel justified in discussing an issue in their L2 if it leads to a better-quality text. In a nutshell, focus through differentiation allows researchers, students, teachers, and even computer-makers, the freedom to not worry about everything all at the same time.

Choice

Another reason that Apple slashed their product catalog so drastically is to reduce customer choice. This may seem illogical. It stands to reason that customers who have more models to choose from will be more likely to find a product that meets their needs, and that this will lead to more sales overall. However, this has been proven not to be the case. In his seminal work The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less, Barry Schwartz and his co-researchers discovered that consumers who strive to find the optimum product are frustrated when presented with a daunting number of choices. For some, more choices make it more difficult to choose. At the same time, if these consumers are later dissatisfied with their purchases, their regret is stronger than customers who didn’t have to put as much thought into their purchase. The customer faced with a plethora of choices risks not only their money, but also the time and effort they spend in meticulously choosing what they think is the right product for them (2016). By artificially reducing the number of choices, Apple decreased friction for people purchasing a new Mac, while at the same time minimizing the regret customers might feel post-purchase. 

This same paradigm of choice can be seen in the world of English teaching, but with slightly different, and more pernicious, outcomes. Dividing English into the Four Skills encourages publishers to design their textbooks similarly. It is perhaps not surprising that a survey of five of the largest language learning textbook publishers in Japan showed that the vast majority of general-purpose ESL/EFL textbooks on the market today either focus on one or two of the Four Skills or concentrate on all Four Skills separately by using units or activities that focus on these skills one at a time. These kinds of books have saturated the market to such an extent that it is difficult to find a general ESL/EFL textbook that doesn’t in some way use the Four Skills quadrant as an organizing principle. This lack of choice in turn steers curriculum and syllabus design. Programs and classes designed using textbooks with a Four-Skills paradigm are unlikely to stray from that model. This tendency further encourages textbook makers to create Four-Skills-based texts, and the cycle reinforces itself. It would not be surprising to find that many of you reading these words have some difficulty thinking of other paradigms that could be used to design a general language learning curriculum. Basic skills such as vocabulary and grammar are necessary but not sufficient. Secondary areas of linguistic study such as syntax and pragmatics do indeed supersede the Four Skills but can be difficult to introduce to lower-level and younger learners, and while they are vital parts of linguistic study, they don’t offer much in the way of basic language usage practice. Even task-based programs and project-based syllabi are commonly divided up into activities which can be neatly slotted into one or two of the four quadrants. 

Divergence

This is the point where our parallel paths of language teaching and Apple products diverge. While Apple’s focus gave it the time and resources to stave off bankruptcy and develop new and more successful products such as the iPod and iPhone, the self-reinforcing cycle of textbook development and curriculum design could conversely be stifling innovation. While Apple avoided ruin using its quadrant-based strategy, it only achieved true success and acclaim when it innovated, branching out to address new markets such as music players and smartphones. English education is also innovating, to be sure. Multimodal, task-based, project-based, Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), and many more strategies are being proposed. But do these innovative strategies have the attributes necessary to eclipse the Four Skills as the iPod eclipsed the Mac? 

iPod analogs

The four-quadrant strategy allowed Apple the breathing room it needed to innovate in the computer space, but surprisingly its first runaway hit after Job’s second coming wasn’t a computer at all – it was the iPod. Unlike a personal computer, the iPod was a one-function device. More of a toy than a tool. It stored and played large amounts of music, and (until later versions added video playback, audiovisual recording, and eventually apps) that was all. Compared to a computer it was easy to understand, had a low barrier to entry, and was a delight to use. At the risk of straining the metaphor to the breaking point, let’s explore some possible alternatives to the Four Skills and see if they meet the three criteria above.

CLIL

CLIL is a content-driven approach in which a student’s second language (L2) is used to teach content such as another subject such as science or geography (Coyle et al., 2010). It unfortunately has neither a low barrier to entry, nor is easy to understand. CLIL has dual goals: to acquire understanding of the content of a particular subject, as well as to acquire the L2 language skills necessary to study and understand that subject. Because of this, students wishing to study in a CLIL environment need a basic grasp of their L2 in order for them to understand subject content and use contextual clues. Teachers should ideally have expertise in the subject being taught as well as have language teaching experience. This makes hiring and training difficult for schools wanting to establish a CLIL program. In addition, texts suitable for CLIL – especially those for students with lower L2 skills, are few and far between. Given the right educator and given that the students are interested in the subject being taught, CLIL can no doubt be quite enjoyable and successful. However, it is more suited for cultures in Europe, for example, where multilingualism is the norm (Darn, 2006). So while CLIL is a relatively new and attractive language teaching method, it is perhaps in part that novelty which keeps it from wide adoption. As it is not easy to understand and has a high bar to entry, it is clear that CLIL is not an iPod analog.

Task-based and project-based methods

Task-based language learning requires students to use their L2 skills to achieve a goal that is not directly related to learning L2 (Willis & Willis, 2010). In the process of achieving this goal, students will consequently strengthen their grasp of the L2 skills required to achieve the goal. In task-based language learning, part of the language learning that takes place is a byproduct of the main lesson goal rather than a direct result of it. Project-based language learning is similar to task-based, except that project-based activities take place over extended periods of time. Both of these methods can be extremely enjoyable and rewarding. Tasks can be games or constructive activities, while projects are often a string of such tasks focused on completing a larger objective. Both of these types of classes can be easy to understand, but there is often a compromise to be made. For lower-level learners especially, tasks and projects that are easy for students to understand must be planned out and tailored for the students by the teacher. This requires a considerable amount of time, effort, and expertise on the teacher’s part. So, the ease by which students are able to complete these tasks and projects is proportional to the difficulty the teacher must go through to prepare them. Not exactly a win-win. Likewise, the lack of a wide selection of task-based or project-based texts makes neither of these turn-key solutions to language learning. While perhaps more approachable than CLIL, task-based and project-based methods still lack a low barrier to entry and so are not iPod analogs. 

Multimodal language learning

Multimodal learning is a formal recognition that productive communication and reception is a combination of various modes. These modes are defined differently by different researchers in different fields, but some common ones are “visual, written, spoken, performative, sonic, and gestural” (Stein, 2000, p. 333). 

Consider your own language consumption today. How much of your language was consumed or produced using exclusively one of the Four Skills? In our current climate of digital media, it is a safe bet that most of the text you read was accompanied by pictures, graphs, and/or charts. It is even more of a certainty that most of the oral language you consumed today was accompanied by video and text. Of course, there are still some language activities that require only one of the four skills, such as listening to a podcast or reading a book. But these single-modal use cases are growing less and less popular as the generations progress and technology allows us to communicate more efficiently, effectively, and entertainingly.

If mixtures of these modes are indeed how most communication is produced, then it stands to reason that students should be trained to recognize and interpret combinations of these numerous kinds of signals. One might imagine an expanded chart like the incomplete one below.

This seems like an expansion of the Four Skills quadrant, but alas, it is not so simple. Multimodal communication, and by extension multimodal teaching, is not simply focusing on these modes separately, or even in sequence. It is rather the active and immediate combination of two or more of these skills. So, one might imagine yet again a more complicated graph or matrix where different modes are joined into pairs or triads to make various skills. For example, in reading this article you have read the words, seen the graphics, and interpreted them. This skill could perhaps be called static multimedia consumption. Imagine now all the different combinations of modes and the number of different skills they could produce. At this point it would be quite natural to throw up one’s hands in exasperation and write off multimodal language learning as hopelessly complicated. 

It is important to remember, however, that the iPod was not a replacement for the more versatile personal computer. It was not a device that tried to do everything. Instead, it did one single thing well. Computers can play music, but their ability to do an extraordinary number of other tasks dictates that they be more complicated than an iPod. The iPod’s limited functionality allows it to be simple. Likewise, concentrating on just one multimodal communication skill could possibly simplify a class, unit, or activity, making it easy to understand. Multimodal education at its core is not hard to grasp. As most of our natural language use is multimodal, the premise at least should be easy to understand for most teachers and students. Currently, there are very few language learning textbooks that focus solely on multimodal skills, but some have started including them together with the canonical Four Skills. Four-Skills textbooks such as Oxford’s Stretch series offer viewing and presenting alongside reading, listening, writing, and speaking. Also, the fact that naturally occurring multimodal materials are easy to find means that the barrier to entry for teaching multimodal skills is not a high one. Finally, if the activities are familiar and the materials are genuine, then multimodal classes shouldn’t be difficult to enjoy or to make enjoyable. Focusing on one multimodal skill seems like it might be a contender for an iPod analog. 

My new iPod

In the future, I can see myself adopting a multimodal skill as the cornerstone of a class syllabus. Instead of focusing on the Four Skills, or a combination of them, I will create classes that focus on one skill that encompasses multiple modes. One promising skill would be presenting. Presenters make use of oral, visual, and semiotic skills to introduce their ideas. Presenting is also a skill that is likely to be used by students in the future, even if they don’t give presentations in their L2. Viewing is also an intriguing possibility. Viewers parse visual, oral, semiotic, and sometimes even textual information in order to understand and appreciate media like videos. As more and more of internet usage becomes video consumption, viewing seems like a multimodal skill that students are likely to find useful in the near future. 

References

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL : content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Darn, S. (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) A European Overview. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490775.pdf

Howatt, A. P. R., & Widdowson, H. G. (2009). A history of English language teaching. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (Original work published 1984) 

Jobs, S. (1997). Apple Product Matrix Strategy [Speech video recording]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/VkVs4ZqWgN8

Marcel, C. (1853). Language as a Means of Mental Culture and International Communication. Bradbury and Evans

Schwartz, B. (2016). The paradox of choice : why more is less. Ecco, An Imprint of Harpercollins Publishers.

Stein, P. (2000). Rethinking resources in the ESL classroom: Rethinking Resources: Multimodal pedagogies in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 333. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587958

Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford University Press.

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2010). Task-based language learning. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, 173–179.

First encounters with constructivism: Theory, implementation and reflections

By Matt Potter

Are students empty vessels waiting to be passively filled with knowledge, or is knowledge a product of their own minds? Constructivists argue the latter, that learners’ knowledge is their own interpretation of reality. 

This article aims to document, explain, and reflect on my own initial experiences of implementing constructivist teaching methodologies in the university language classroom. In writing this article, I hope to provide a rationale for employing constructivist principles in teaching while also outlining a general framework for other teachers who may wish to apply these concepts in their teaching. 

Definitions and theory

The foundation of constructivism in education derives from Piaget’s theory of cognitive development and Vygotsky’s theory of social development. Piaget (2006) posited that new knowledge is constructed on an individual’s pre-existing base of knowledge and experiences. New knowledge is then created by adding to and adjusting this prior knowledge. Vygotsky suggested that learning takes place within the zone of proximal development; the difference between what a learner can achieve alone versus what they can accomplish with assistance from others (Ortega, 2014). With guidance from parents, teachers or more knowledgeable peers, learners’ knowledge is created and shaped through involvement in their social environment. As such, learner knowledge is actively constructed through this involvement and interaction with their environment, as opposed to passive acquisition from teacher to student (Schcolnik, Kol & Abarbanel, 2006). 

Merrill (1991) outlined four key assumptions of constructivist theory. Firstly, that learning is based in an individual’s own interpretation of the world. Secondly, through the active process of learning, meaning is developed from experience. Thirdly, learning should take place within an authentic context, and finally, that conceptual growth is achieved through negotiation of meaning, sharing of perspectives and learner collaboration. 

Studies have demonstrated the positive impact of constructivist theory and methodologies in the language classroom. Through their emphasis on learner autonomy, constructivist methodologies in combination with culturally relevant materials encourage students to take responsibility for their learning and allow them to investigate topics relevant to their individual interests (Sheridan, Tanaka & Kobayashi, 2018). Fritz (2016) concluded that curriculum design centred around constructivist principles can “become an integral part of a student’s transition from student to researcher” (p. 130). Altun and Buyukduman (2007) noted that constructivist approaches improved vocabulary retention, student concentration and enabled students to make connections in the material by utilizing the examples of their peers, attributing these benefits to the freedom afforded to students to acquire their own knowledge. Boekaerts and Minnaert (2006) found that group collaboration can positively influence the psychological need states of perceived autonomy, competence, and social relatedness, leading to students’ feelings of having had a positive learning experience.  

Implementation in the classroom; The 5E model 

The research of Myron Atkin and Robert Karlus led to the development of the 5E model of constructivist teaching and learning; Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate and Evaluate (Lesley University, n.d). Firstly, the teacher must engage students by activating existing knowledge and fostering an interest in the lesson content. This can be done by asking open questions or asking students to brainstorm their knowledge of the topic. Secondly, students are given time to explore the content independently and actively, developing their ideas and opinions from their investigations and sharing these with their peers. In the third step, learners explain, clarify, and justify their findings. Students can critically evaluate the ideas of their peers, and the teacher can introduce additional resources to further their understanding of the topic. In the elaboration phase, students apply what they have learned to new contexts through additional research, discussion, and collaboration. Using formal or informal assessment, the evaluation phase allows teachers to evaluate learners’ understanding of the material. Evaluation may be conducted by the teacher or by students in the form of peer or self-evaluation, or a mix of the two together. 

Unit content

The unit of study in question takes place with freshman Faculty of Law students at a mid-sized regional university in Japan. Conducted over four lessons, it is centred around the 2019 film “On the Basis of Sex” which depicts the life of former associate justice of the United States Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It primarily focuses on two areas of Ginsburg’s life; her time as an undergraduate at Harvard University, and a landmark appeal that she fought to overturn gender discrimination embedded in the U.S constitution. The film’s overarching themes include those of gender discrimination, the evolution of law in relation to societal values, perseverance and familial love and support.  As such, the film is an engaging English language resource, providing insight into the workings of a foreign country’s legal system while bringing to the fore the issue of gender equality, for which Japan currently ranks number 125 out of 146 nations (NHK, 2023). 

The four lessons described below take place in the middle of a 15-week semester, with course work building toward a cumulative academic presentation task. Prior to the unit described in this article, students are taught physical presentation techniques as well as how to effectively structure a presentation. Following the unit, students are tasked with planning, writing, and performing a group academic presentation around the topic of social issues in Japan, based on research they have undertaken. 

Lesson one

In the first lesson, three open ended questions and one task are presented to promote engagement with the content. The questions are:

  1. Do you think gender discrimination exist in Japan? Why/Why not? 
  2. What women’s rights activists or human rights activists do you know of? 
  3. Do you know of Beate Sirota Gordon or Ruth Bader Ginsburg? What do you know about them? 
  4. Look up some information about these people. Who are they? Why are they famous? 

Students are put into groups of four and given around 40 minutes to freely discuss the first three questions. During discussion students are encouraged to take individual notes in either Japanese or English. Following the discussion, students are presented with links to two YouTube videos. One is a three-minute BBC documentary piece in English with Japanese subtitles, providing an overview of Ginsburg’s life, career, and achievements. The other is a 15-minute excerpt from a Japanese talk show that describes Ginsburg’s cultural impact, as well as contrasting key aspects of the Supreme Courts in Japan and America. Students are asked to write up short answers in English for questions one, two and three and conduct internet research for task four as homework. 

Lesson two

In lesson two, students are again put into small groups and are given around 45 minutes to discuss and share their findings from the homework task and write simple responses in English for each of the questions on a shared piece of A3-size paper. The teacher’s role in this phase is to monitor groupwork and assist, clarify and encourage where necessary to further develop the students’ ideas. Following discussion, groups are then asked to evaluate their notes and identify the most important, interesting, or original points within the group. Students then write these on the blackboard. At this stage, it is important for the teacher to check each group’s worksheet to help to identify knowledge that may add to the collaboration and encourage students to share those thoughts as well. The teacher then summarizes the class’s ideas and opinions, adding additional information, context, or feedback where necessary. A picture is then taken of the blackboard and uploaded to the class learning management system for students to access as required.

Figure 1 and 2. Class brainstorm for discussion questions

Students are then presented with the questions they will be assigned for their written assessment task which centres on the film “On the Basis of Sex”. These questions are:

  1. Which character was the most interesting for you and why?
  2. What do you think are the main themes or most important points of the film?
  3. What new things did you learn about law, equality, or history? 
  4. What are your reactions to the film? What was surprising, shocking, inspiring, or impressive to you?
  5. Create three questions you have about this film, or about the issue of equality in general. 

Students are encouraged to write these questions into their notebooks, leaving space for notetaking after each question. For task five, the difference between open and closed questions is explained and examples are provided. Students are urged to think of open questions which will in turn require deeper research and produce longer answers. The class then begin watching the film together. Students are asked to consolidate their notes for the first act of the film as homework.

Lesson three

At the beginning of the third lesson, students are reminded of the assignment questions and urged to take notes during the film. The class then watch the film together and students are again asked to consolidate their notes as homework. 

Lesson four

At the beginning of lesson four, the class watch the remainder of the film. Students again form small groups and are provided time to discuss and share their ideas relating to questions two, three, four and five of the assignment, after which the answers are shared on the blackboard. As in lesson two, the teacher’s role here is to oversee the discussion and help the groups to further conceptualize their ideas and insights. The teacher also summarizes the findings of the class and uploads photographs of the blackboard for student self-access.  Students are then asked to explain and justify their findings by answering the assignment questions in their own words. In the following class, assignments are collected for summative assessment and constructive feedback is provided to students. 

Figure 3 and 4. Class brainstorm for assignment questions. 

Post-unit

While beyond the scope of this article, it is worth briefly mentioning the elaboration phase which takes place as part of the following unit of study in which students are tasked with creating a group academic presentation based on societal issues in Japan. Students are provided with media highlighting various social issues in Japan, and students then discuss, share, and modify the assignment question they have created to collaboratively develop a research focus for this task. Performance of this task is then evaluated using a combination of both student self-assessment and teacher assessment. 

Reflections

The autonomy afforded through a constructivist-based syllabus allows students to focus on areas of content that they find particularly interesting or relevant to themselves. This, in combination the with the freedom to conduct research in their own way and from sources of their own choosing promotes stronger engagement with the content. Moreover, by practically implementing research skills such as the independent generation of open questions and encouragement of self-directed inquiry, students can further develop their competence as independent researchers.  

Putting students at the centre of their learning helps to change the traditionally teacher centred dynamic of the Japanese classroom. By allowing students to apply their own knowledge they can be positioned as relative experts of their field of study, helping to build confidence in sharing their opinions with peers and the teacher. In addition, the open-ended nature of the discussion and assignment questions urges students to think deeply and more critically about their ideas in relation to the content. Collaborative group discussion greatly widens the scope of knowledge that students are exposed to when compared to a more individualistic classroom structure, while socially active learning also appears to remove affective filters that may accompany content-based language learning on a challenging and unfamiliar topic. Finally, a constructivist approach allows learners to function at their own level of interlanguage, potentially reducing anxiety toward foreign language learning, and affording students many opportunities for peer assisted social support, language modelling, correction, and feedback. 

Certain pre-conditions may be necessary to employ constructivism effectively in the university context. Institutions must allow instructors the autonomy to develop and implement courses as they see fit, and a mutual understanding and trust between teachers and students regarding course expectations and outcomes is necessary. Nevertheless, with time, flexibility and patience, teachers can provide learners with the freedom to interpret, create and construct their own reality while reaping the cognitive educational benefits that constructivist methodologies provide. 

Acknowledgement 

This article would not have been possible without my friend and mentor, Susan Bergman-Miyake. Thank you always for your guidance, encouragement, trust, and insight.

References

Altun, S., & Buyukduman, I. (2007). Teacher and student beliefs on constructivist instructional design: A case study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 7, (1) 30-39.

Boekaerts, M. &  Minnaert, A.  (2006).  Affective and Motivational Outcomes of Working in Collaborative Groups, Educational Psychology, 26:2,187-208, DOI: 10.1080/01443410500344217

Fritz, E. (2016). A Case for an ESP Constructivist Approach to Teaching English Writing Courses at Science and Technology Universities. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 21, 123-132. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/reader/ 143641100

Lesley University, (n.d). Empowering Students: The 5E Model Explained. Retrieved from https://lesley.edu/article/empowering-students-the-5e-model-explained

Merrill, M.D. (1991). Constructivism and Instructional Design. Educational Technology, 31 (5), 45-53. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44427520

NHK,  (2023, June 21) Japan slips to 125th in gender equality rankings. NHK World

Retrieved from https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/backstories/2538/

Ortega, L. (2014). Understanding second language acquisition. Routledge.  

Piaget, J. (2006). Success and Understanding (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9780203715826

Schcolnik, M., Kol, S., & Abarbanel, J. (2006). Constructivism in Theory and in Practice. English Teaching Forum, 4, 12-20. Retrieved from https://americanenglish. state.gov/files/ae/resource_files/06-44-4-c.pdf

Sharma, L.S., Poonam, G . (2016). Constructivist Approach for Teaching English: Making Sense of Paradigm Shift from the Traditional Approach. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(10), 788-792. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/ archive/v5i10/ART20162198.pdf 

Sheridan, R., Tanaka, K.M., Kobayashi, J. (2018). Culture and Constructivism: A New Approach to Student Centred English Language Education in Japan. Kindai University for Liberal Arts and Foreign Language Education Journal, 9 (2) 33-56. 

A Review of Speak Now 4: A great bug-killer, and a somewhat great textbook

By Hugh Dornan

For the past several years, I have been teaching at the Kyoto University of Advanced Science campus in the mountains of Kameoka, Kyoto. Speak Now 4 has been a useful tool for more than a few reasons – not least, for fighting off all manners of beasties that fly in through the windows around summer. Having had to spring into action on a number of occasions to protect my screaming students from hornets and other pests, this textbook was a good tool for fighting off those things, as well as for helping my students improve upon their English, too!

Is Speak Now 4 the greatest textbook ever created? Or is it a complete mess? Please continue reading if you want to find out!

Speak Now 4 is the last in a four-book series ranging from beginner to intermediate level. The textbook is designed to develop students’ communication skills, with most units consisting of a vocabulary, reading, and a listening and pronunciation section. Each part also comes with a language booster section that introduces some key phrases or expressions, making it a good all-around textbook that covers all the key components for learning English.

 

The textbook is organised into 8 chapters and 32 units that are broken down into the following sections: Careers, People, Socialising, Lifestyles, Feelings, Travel, Pop Culture, and In The News. I believe these topic choices by the authors are appropriate and cover topics that students will be able to talk about in conversations with English speakers in possible future situations. 

There are listening exercises based on the printed conversations in the textbook that students can use to listen for pronunciation, for those students who want to improve their pronunciation, intonation, and stress during class pronunciation practice or for self-practice at home. One good point about these listening exercises is that they use a variety of different accents from native and non-native English speakers. I thought this was great, as it gives the students a chance to listen to various accents, instead of just the North American accents that are heard in most textbook audio tracks. This is because most English speakers that Japanese students come across will be from countries like the Philippines, Korea, China, and Indonesia, using English as a second language. As these nations are geographically close, a large number of tourists or business travelers visit Japan. To paraphrase Seghbosyan, allowing students to be exposed to variations of English and a variety of accents will assist them in a multitude of situations, be they business or private (2021).

The textbook has a very clean layout and design. It’s easy for the students to read and the sections have a well-arranged flow to follow. Students then know what to expect in each chapter. The textbook achieves this by going for a minimalistic approach, making good use of white space to make a visual separation between elements and to improve readability. It also avoids excess use of colours and images that can distract learners, and also by ensuring consistent alignment throughout the text to reinforce the content, it thus creates a visual harmony of sorts to help readers. 

There are also eight videos, one for each chapter, that can be watched in the online practice section. Each video is based on the chapter’s topic and lasts for two to three minutes. They give the students an opportunity to watch the speaker’s body language, gestures, and how they move their mouths when speaking. These are things they wouldn’t be able to get from listening to audio. 

And finally, the textbook also has an online self-assessment section that students can log into using a code on the back of their textbook. This should be simple to do, however, some students and colleagues have had issues with the site not being intuitive, or other cases of not being able to sign in. If these could be resolved, then it would make both students and teachers much more satisfied with utilising self-assessments and other online tools.

I used Speak Now 4 over the course of two full 15-week semesters. I used it for a reading and pronunciation class for third-year students at KUAS in a 90-minute weekly class. There may have been better-suited textbooks for this class, but for the students’ abilities, it seemed suitable. This is due to the fact it was challenging enough for intermediate-level students, while not being overly difficult for the lower intermediate-level students, with a good balance of speaking, listening, and reading. I used the audio recordings at the beginning of the class to let students listen to pronunciation, stress, and intonation. A 20-year-old female student mentioned the layout was pleasing to the eye and had an easy-to-follow structure. A 21-year-old male student said the topics were quite interesting and relatable for learners his age. Finally, a 21-year-old female student said there was a problem with some units being too easy while proceeding units could be quite challenging, and then units would become easier again. 

To use weightlifting as an analogy, if you lift the same weight every day, after a point your muscles won’t develop anymore. The same can be said about studying a language like English where one needs to be challenged in order to improve. Despite accolades from some of my students, this textbook‘s content can be seen as superficial. This may seem like a disadvantage but could allow the teacher to expand when needed or elicit content from students. Teachers who are using the book for a speaking class where there is an emphasis on student talk time will need to expand on what’s included in the textbook with, for example, supplementary handouts of extra phrases and expressions based on those in the book. 

So, to conclude, Speak Now 4 is a useful tool to expose students to an even mix of speaking, listening, reading, and useful phrases and expressions without being too difficult. For those who teach intermediate or lower-intermediate level students, this is a decent resource to use. However, it would be better if the material became more challenging as students progressed through the book. This would then help avoid stagnation and allow the students to push themselves more to advance their English. Providing students with some higher-level idioms, vocabulary, and a more detailed audio track, could help improve the students’ English abilities even more as they progress through the textbook. 

References

Seghbosyan, A. (2021, October 2). Varieties of English: Why is it important for students to know that? SkyTeach. https://skyteach.ru/2021/02/10/ varieties-of-english-why-is-it-important-for-students-to-know-that/

Considering the catastrophic: Reflections on losing a student and coping strategies

By John Guy Perrem

Introduction

Teaching is inherently dedicated towards trying to build better futures for both students and society in general. When we teach we imagine the knowledge we impart and the skills we seek to develop will contribute as small useful pieces within the wider tapestry of a student’s life. We hope that as they move forward through the school system, find jobs and eventually build their adult lives they can draw upon such knowledge. The effort we pour into nurturing and building relationships with our students is part of an ideal and tacit long term plan for them all to have long fruitful lives. Of course, many of our students struggle on their young journey through life and education. Still, we expect them to endure, and even if a dream of attaining a place at a desired university is broken, or a familial issue overly burdens them, we imagine they will persist beyond us because that is how things are simply meant to be in a teacher-student relationship.  

However, we do not often imagine that our students’ young lives can be suddenly cut short. The death of a student goes against unspoken rules that we will teach and they will learn and thrive. It breaches the feeling that there is a proper order to things and shatters hopes across a range of scales, from the class, to the year, to the whole school, and it has barbs that reach out beyond the school into the wider community. I was unfortunate enough to go through the process of losing a student and this paper is an attempt to encapsulate reflections upon that experience, offer some insights and provide points of departure about loss in a classroom context for other educators to consider. 

Prior to my student passing, we had no indication that such a thing would occur and our classes had been proceeding as usual. ‘Usual’ is relative for each teacher’s relationship with each class, but I was fortunate in that I had created a positive learning environment and had good relationships with the class on the whole. I remember the energetic activity of the class in the days before my student passed because that lively dynamic stood in such stark contrast to what was to follow in the coming days. The class had been doing a lot of small group work that week and I had especially enjoyed watching the dynamics unfold with the mixture of personalities working together towards creating posters. Apart from typical minor contentions regarding the best way to phrase something or quibbles over which color palette to use, there was a lively and productive energy in the class. When small group work was taking place the groups would push their tables together and I would walk around the classroom to visit each group in turn to check if any clarifications were needed, offer advice if requested, and pass some constructive comments on the emerging work. The final lesson before the passing of my student proceeded much as described above and when I wrapped up the class for the day and went home, I was wholly unprepared for what would unfold the following morning when I arrived at work. 

When I arrived at the school early the next morning, I was immediately asked by two colleagues to come to a small teacher’s meeting room. I thought that this was quite unusual and I began to wonder what could have possibly happened that necessitated such an urgent meeting. I instantly noticed the pain on their faces and that their eyes were red from crying. From their faces and the atmosphere, I knew that whatever I was about to be told was going to change something fundamentally in my life, I was just not certain who exactly it would relate to yet. One colleague could not talk due to their grief and so the other bore the burden of relaying the news that one of my students had died the night before. It is hard to describe the weight of such moments and the emotions that emerge from them. I recall my mind simultaneously racing through many emotions and an opposite sense that everything had suddenly paused. This sense of emotional compression and expansion stayed with me through the coming days and weeks as I tried and often failed to fathom what had happened.  

In the wake of my student dying, it was certainly difficult to balance my own emotions with my responsibilities to the class that I had to continue teaching. Two key points that emerge here are that teachers need to find appropriate spaces and management methods for their emotions, and that they must endeavor to still lead their students. It can be helpful then for teachers to seek community and collegial support and resources to aid their own well-being (Cloitre & Koplewicz, 2006) and I will explore these aspects more presently.    

The sudden death of a student is a devastating and distressing event that can have a profound effect on a class. This loss can be particularly difficult for students who were close to the deceased, as well as for teachers and staff who had a personal relationship with the student. In this article, I will reflect upon and explore various ways in which the sudden death of a student can impact a teacher and a class, and consider strategies for managing and coping with such a loss.

As mentioned at the outset of this paper, when we teach our students we are doing so from a future oriented perspective. We cover aspects of the world and help prepare students to communicate and interact within it so they can succeed. And so, while helping to fulfill their academic and personal goals we are engaged in the business of ‘hope’. Hope that they will achieve what they wish to and hope that the materials they encounter in the classroom will prepare them well for their future encounters with life. Although strands of the material we cover or use in class may contain aspects of loss, there is not a dedicated aspect which prepares students to navigate the waters in the wake of suffering a loss personally. 

From my own experience, the sudden loss of a student can ripple profoundly through almost all facets of the learning environment. The loss can weave through multiple classes and interpersonal interconnections and can even feel embedded in the concrete and stone of an institution. The passing of time lessens the acuteness of the pain, but the loss stays rooted regardless as a type of indelible mark. Upon reflection, my teaching experience was split at the point in time when I lost a student into a ‘before’ period and an ‘after’ period. The ‘after’ period has made me more aware and cognizant of the challenges that accompany managing loss in educational settings. My unpreparedness in the ‘before’ period also made me realize that, although a difficult and uncomfortable topic, devoting some time and consideration to the possibility of losing a student would have been useful in both personal and pedagogic terms. Previously, I had never dedicated time to consider the possibility of losing a student as it seemed overly macabre to do so. But we are not insulated from death simply because we work with young people, be it in primary, secondary, or tertiary education. This article then, is an attempt to draw our focus towards loss in hopes of promoting useful thought processes around the topic as educators.

Teacher grief

While the mental and physical well-being of students is a top priority for us as educators, it should also be noted that teachers also suffer following the loss of a student and may need spaces to express their grief. Losing a student can have a profound impact on non-teaching staff too who also work in the school. As I have mentioned previously, in my own case, my whole teaching practice is divided into a before and after period as a result of the loss. Loss can also be a challenging and emotionally draining experience as teachers. In the days following the loss of my student I attended their funeral and in that very human and communal experience in the presence of their family, the line between the role of being a teacher, and the expectations which that position can bring, and simply being a human who was also grieving, became somewhat blurred. One the one hand, I felt determined to show strength as I had to continue teaching the class, and I wanted to ensure that I appeared composed so students could feel like I could be relied upon if they needed support. While, on the other hand, internally, I battled with the loss I was acutely feeling. In addition to the class that I had to continue teaching, I was also teaching an older sibling of the student I lost in a school club activity. That aspect was especially difficult. As I approached to pay my respects to the family during the funeral and reached out to touch the sibling’s shoulder, I was at a loss for how I would proceed with some form of normalcy in our contact. Both during and in the aftermath of the funeral I felt that I should know what to do, but upon reflection, allowing the sense of ‘not knowing’ and that that sense of uncertainty was completely acceptable as a grieving teacher.  

In recent teacher grief research conducted by Dunn (2022, p. 322) other teachers “described hiding emotions they perceived as negative, navigating the teacher role, and supporting students’ needs over their own”. (Dunn, 2022, p. 322). And from my own experience I seemed to have at least partially followed this pattern of behavior that other teachers had similarly adopted at that early stage of grief in the immediate wake of the loss. In my own experience, I turned to my colleagues for support in due course, as they did to me, in order to process and express feelings of shock and grief. And the shared experience of being teachers was helpful in that we had a commonality of experience and vocation to draw upon. 

Conducting classes in the wake of loss

I have outlined the feelings and struggles surrounding grief, but what about conducting actual classes in the wake of loss? The empty seat and desk in the classroom proved to be a constant reminder that we had all suffered a profound loss during the running of classes, and this had varying impacts. The loss of a classmate can be a significant source of stress and disruption for students, and it may be difficult for them to focus on their studies in the aftermath of the tragedy. In line with literature on the topic, some of the students in my class did indeed initially struggle to attend school as normal, or to fully engage in their usual academic activities. There were also higher levels of distraction during lessons. As their teacher, this necessitated me to be additionally supportive and accommodating to help the class cope. I needed to be flexible in terms of in-class assignments, homework deadlines and similar aspects of study. In this way we proceeded together gently, and the classroom work proved to be a vehicle towards remaining focused on the fact that we were working together and still alive.

Similar to other research on conducting classes after a loss, such as that of Dunn’s important 2022 “Teaching While Grieving a Death,” I found that it was essential to be accommodating, sensitive towards building trusting relationships, and to work with my students to find ways to support their academic progress while my students, and myself, were grieving. It is important to note that loss has a long tail, and things will improve but will certainly be different even after the initial challenges and grief have somewhat subsided.

Research has shown that the sudden death of a student in some cases can have a significant influence on the normal functioning of a class (Dyregrov et al., 2008), and that loss can cause disruptions in various ways, including through student absences or distraction, as well as changes in teachers’ teaching style or level of engagement. Bearing these grief centered disruptions in mind may serve to be useful to educators when they contemplate the potential impacts of losing a student and knowing that an element of turmoil will be inherent. 

Reflective practice and the effect of loss on the teacher and class

In the wake of a student’s death, teachers can often experience a range of complex and varied emotions, from deep sadness and shock to anger and even hope (Dunn, 2022, p. 322). As such, it is essential for teachers to have the necessary tools and strategies to manage the emotional weight of the loss. Overall, there is a gap academically regarding the impact and experiences pertaining to the loss of a student. As Dunn, (2022, p. 315) states “classrooms should be inclusive of both teachers’ and students’ grief and loss experiences; however, teachers’ grieving experiences remain understudied”. Teaching about death in English language classrooms can be a challenging task for teachers in itself. This is because there can be a need for teacher’s to emotionally manage themselves (Dunn & Johnson, 2020) in relation to personally moving literature about loss, touching poetry or other poignant media related to deaths from war or natural disasters that may appear as learning material in classes. This is not to mention managing and facilitating classes when a student in that class actually passes away. Reflective practice may be one of the most effective tools for teachers in this situation. 

Reflective practice is a process of self-reflection in which one examines their own beliefs, thoughts, and behavior in order to gain a better understanding of their impact on the situation (Brookfield, 1995). This thoughtful process allows teachers to take a step back and consider the emotions they are experiencing as well as the actions they take. It is used widely as a versatile tool in teaching practice for professional development. Through this method, teachers can gain an insight into their own experience and perspectives, as well as the potential to adjust their approach to better manage their emotions. The reflective process is also beneficial for teachers in that it allows them to create a safe space in which they can process their grief while also ensuring that the needs of the other students in their classroom are met. By engaging in reflective practice, teachers can identify the most effective ways to support their students in the wake of the loss, such as providing additional emotional support or creating an environment in which open discussion about the death is encouraged. 

One of the most immediate and profound effects of the sudden death of a student is the emotional toll it takes on the class (Dyregrov et al., 2008). Similar to other bereaved people, students who were close to the deceased may experience intense feelings of grief and loss and may struggle to concentrate and function in the days, weeks, and even months following the death (Bonanno et al., 2004; Dyregrov et al., 2008). Research by Dyregrov et al. (2008) has shown that the level of grief experienced when a classmate is lost can be equal to that of losing a sibling and that some students still suffer acutely nine months after the loss. Even students who were not particularly close to the deceased may be affected by the loss, as a nearby death can serve as a reminder of their own transience and may raise fears about their own safety and physical well-being (Cloitre & Koplewicz, 2006). The death of a student can be a devastating and traumatic event for those who knew the individual, and this can have long-term negative consequences regarding well-being, as not all students are equally resilient (Capewell, 1994). It is important for those who are grieving to take the time to process their emotions and to seek out support from friends and family, and it is equally important they are directed to psychologists and professionals as needed (Costelloe et al., 2020). 

From my own experience, it is important to acknowledge and validate the grief that one is feeling. This can be a challenging process, as grief is often accompanied by a range of intense and sometimes conflicting emotions, such as sadness, anger and guilt (Dunn, 2022). I found that reflective practice was an invaluable tool for me as a teacher to manage the emotional weight of the death of one of my students. For a successful restorative process to unfold it is important to allow oneself to not only feel and reflect but to also express these emotions, rather than trying to suppress or ignore them (Neimeyer, 2005). But as a teacher, the time and place of such expressions needs to be suitable. In my own experience, I found what I call ‘transitional moments’ during the school day to be useful for connecting with my students about the deceased, enabling them to express or share in simple ways. I will expound on these moments in the following section.

Daily transitional moments between the teacher and class

The foundation of successful pedagogy is comprised of numerous elements. And of prime importance among those is the bond between the teacher and the student (Ransom, 2020). The historical hierarchical dynamic of imparting knowledge through a sense of fear has thankfully transformed, although not universally, into a more mutualistic dynamic of empathy and understanding (Grove O’Grady, 2020). This mutualistic dynamic necessitates a depth of emotional and professional commitment from the educator to enable both the personal development of the student and to sustain their interest, knowledge and skills in their language learning journey.

This bond brings rewards to the educator in that by knowing the student on a more meaningful level they can assist them in tackling challenges. From my experience, this  includes complex challenges like grief. Additionally, such a bond can assist with helping students to mature as individuals and enhance their learning process (Tsai, 2017). Moreover, practical aspects such as managing classroom behavior through being able to relate to the student on a compassionate and personal level can maintain a productive atmosphere rather than needing to escalate towards classical punitive strategies or deploying punitive logical consequence tactics (Kyriacou, 2007).

This bond is established through quotidian moments that are rooted in the seemingly banal flow of daily classroom life. The everyday encounter, far from being banal, is the thread with which the relational bond is stitched. The moments in the seams of the school day when a breath is taken between classes, the pause passing in the corridor when greetings can be exchanged or in the occasionally boisterous minutes prior to the bell all allow space for developing relationships. These moments can be conceived of as a thread stitching together a supportive tapestry. Naturally these small-scale moments are complimentary to more targeted guidance and support (Cloitre & Koplewicz, 2006), but they also provide an opportunity for consistent potential glimpses into the life of the student rather than more isolated and formalized guidance meetings or commemoration events.

My perception of these moments became significantly more important following the loss of my student. Prior to the loss, the daily transitional moments were largely unreflective spaces. My mental focus was essentially on looking directly ahead to the next lesson and the accompanying swirling series of practicalities, such as locations, materials and content. They were also moments of respite to catch a breath. That is not to say that interactions were not occurring with students during those snippets of time, but that my ability to really ‘look’ or ‘consider‘ during them was fundamentally different.

The hustle and bustle between classes was previously largely a superficial affair oscillating between practicalities and conviviality. Losing my student substantially changed my internal thought process surrounding the need for being prepared to manage such a situation and how different support mechanisms are important for both the teacher and student. Experiencing the process of coming to terms with losing a student has made me consider transitional moments to be a set of valuable observational and interactive opportunities that also allow for space for remembrance of the lost student. I began to use them as opportunities for students to express memories of their lost classmate in small ways if they desired to. For example, they provided micro-platforms for referencing something that was unfolding in the real world that the deceased would have enjoyed, such as an event or a new game that they would have been interested in playing. These transitional moments also sometimes allowed indicators to emerge that needed further examination or inquiries made using the web of social connections of school life that yielded valuable insights regarding classmate well-being.

Reflection on how transitional moments worked

I found that a key to allowing space for transitional moments to unfold was in my body language and awareness in reading the atmosphere of the class. As I mentioned previously, prior to the death of my student I was focused on the “busyness” of an upcoming class. However, through reflective practice, I was able to become more aware and consciously make my body language welcoming and open to interactions with students between classes. In concrete terms, this meant I looked around the room between classes more actively rather than looking down at whatever materials I was going to use. Mentally, I remained present in the moment rather than projecting into the future about the procedure the upcoming lesson plan would follow. 

I found that this mental run-through for a lesson is a valuable practice, but it can be done at other times to leave space for connecting with students between lessons. By visually scanning the classroom and being mentally present, I was sometimes able to notice a student who looked like they wanted to be approached, and this allowed me to instigate communication. Alternatively, moments were instigated through making a small gesture like a wave or a smile for the student to feel comfortable about approaching me at my desk. Generally, a majority of students approached my desk to communicate, and this seemed more comfortable than me moving to them. These are small and subtle gestures and indicators that require awareness and an ability to read the room. 

The moments of remembrance usually had a positive disposition although framed with an understandable sadness. Additionally, I found that using a soft tone of voice allowed students to share these moments of remembrance without a great deal of attention being drawn to them. Another aspect was that sometimes students would approach in pairs or in small groups, and I welcomed this as it allowed for a sense of communal sharing. I tried to remain flexible in allowing for the mix of emotions that would emerge in the moments. Importantly, I was aware to not always deliver a pep talk at every opportunity but rather to actively listen and acknowledge the emotional difficulty of the situation. The moments themselves would conclude naturally through the necessity for the next class to start, by the student(s) signaling its conclusion or by my own facilitation. I used a similar gentle approach via transitional moments with the sibling of the student I lost in the school club activity. Although I paid particular care to them when I looked during those moments to ensure they were doing as well as could be expected. If a teacher is unfortunate to find themselves in a similar situation of loss, I can recommend using these transitional moments as a form of supportive scaffolding for their class and indeed, they may wish to consider their use in their everyday teaching practice even without suffering a loss. 

Conclusion

The sudden death of a student can be an overwhelming and challenging event that can have a profound consequence on a class and a teacher (Dunn, 2022; Dyregrov et al., 2008). A key takeaway is that it is important to, in a gentle manner, provide adequate support to students and oneself as an educator and to address any disruptions that may crop up. As their teacher, it is paramount to be sensitive to the needs of students to help them cope with the loss of their classmate in a resilient way (Cloitre & Koplewicz, 2006).

Transitional moments allow for a series of concrete steps to be undertaken by the teacher to create space for the aforementioned support to occur in the normal everyday classroom. Firstly, the teacher needs to engage their own awareness and mentally prepare themselves to look. This means actively thinking about the snippets of time they have rather than allowing time to pass without awareness. Secondly, they can scan the classroom environment and really look at their students’ faces or body language for cues. If cues are present, the teacher can then use a positive gesture or their body language to ensure that a student/group of students know an approach is welcomed. This can be done through a wave or a simple smile, for example. When the transitional moment is unfolding, using a soft tone of voice is helpful and maintaining an awareness of the need to listen. Importantly, delivering a pep talk is not always necessary and maintaining a sense of subtlety is beneficial so that the informality of the sharing regarding their lost classmate is not made into a major focal point of attention. Finally, the teacher can expect emotions tied to grief to surface and needs to understand that these do not have to be forced out. Through reflection the pain of the teacher’s own grief can become more bearable and help the teacher to function better in transitional moments of loss sharing. 

In my experience the direct impact of these steps facilitated students being able to express their thoughts and feelings about their departed classmate in an informal, voluntary, and non-pressurised setting. This allowed for forms of solace and a sense of community to emerge in small but important ways amongst us. For myself as a teacher, my students and us all as grievers in different ways and with different roles and expectations.  

Finally, it is important to remember that the grieving process is different for everyone, and it is especially important to be sensitive to oneself if you ever find yourself navigating such a tough situation during your teaching practice. While schools, universities, and teaching are so closely bound to improving and embracing development during our lives, they are not beyond being impacted by loss, and acknowledging rather than ignoring that painful fact may prove useful.

References

Bonanno, G. A., Wortman, C. B., & Nesse, R. M. (2004). Prospective patterns of resilience and maladjustment during widowhood. Psychology and aging, 19(2), 260–271.

Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. Jossey-Bass.

Capewell, E. (1994). Responding to children in trauma: a systems approach for schools. Bereavement Care, 13, 2-7.

Cloitre, M. & Koplewicz, H. (2006). Caring for Kids After Trauma, Disaster and Death: A guide for parents and professions. New York University Child Study Center, 2, 1-64.

Costelloe, A., Mintz, J., & Lee, F. (2020). Bereavement support provision in primary schools: An exploratory study. Educational Psychology in Practice, 36(2), 281-296.

Dyregrov, A., Gjestad, R., Wikander, A., & Vigerust, S. (2008). Reactions following the sudden death of a classmate. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 167-176.

Dunn, M. & Johnson, R. (2020). Loss in The English Classroom: A Study of English Teachers’ Emotion Management During Literature Instruction. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 16, 1-21.

Dunn, M. (2022). Teaching While Grieving a Death: Navigating the Complexities of Relational Work, Emotional Labor, and English Language Arts Teaching. English Education, 54, 315-332.

Grove O’Grady, A. (2020). Pedagogy, Empathy and Praxis. Palgrave Pivot,

Kyriacou, C. (2007). Essential Teaching Skills. Nelson Thornes Publishing.

Neimeyer, R. (2005). Grief, loss, and the quest for meaning. Bereavement Care, 24, 27-30.

Ransom, J. C. (2020). Love, Trust, and Camaraderie: Teachers’ Perspectives of Care in an Urban High School. Education and Urban Society, 52(6), 904–926.

Tsai, K. C. (2017). Teacher-Student Relationships, Satisfaction, and Achievement among Art and Design College Students in Macau. Journal of Education and Practice, 8, 12-16.

 

Op-Ed: Bicycle for the mind

Limitations of AI language instruction

By ChatGPT-3.5 (edited by Joël Laurier)

While the advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) like myself have undoubtedly revolutionized various fields, including language learning, it is essential to critically examine the limitations and potential drawbacks of delegating to AI the job of language teaching. 

Despite the promises of personalized learning and instant feedback, language learning platforms driven by AI such as myself have inherent limitations. While our algorithms can analyze learning preferences and adapt content accordingly, we may struggle to capture the intricacies of individual learning needs accurately. Human instructors, on the other hand, can provide tailored guidance based on their expertise and intuitive understanding of learners’ progress, which we AI models may lack.

Language learning is a profoundly human endeavor that relies on communication and interaction. While AI models can simulate conversations and provide feedback, we cannot replicate the richness and complexity of human-to-human interaction. Human instructors can offer immediate clarification, emotional support, and cultural insights, while AI models may struggle to provide these things.

Over-dependence on AI in language education may lead to a wide range of potential risks. First, learners may become overly reliant on AI models, inhibiting their ability to think critically and problem-solve independently. Second, AI-driven platforms may reinforce a standardized approach to language learning, neglecting the diversity of individual learning styles and preferences. Lastly, the collection and analysis of personal data by our systems raises concerns about privacy and security.

Rather than viewing AI as a replacement for human instructors, a more rational approach is to recognize the complementary roles we can play in language education. While AI models can offer personalized content and instant feedback, human instructors bring empathy, cultural understanding, and the ability to adapt to individual needs. Combining the strengths of both AI and human instructors can create a more comprehensive and effective language learning experience.

While AI-driven language learning platforms offer undeniable benefits, it is essential to acknowledge our limitations and potential risks. Language learning is a multifaceted process that requires human interaction, cultural understanding, and critical thinking. By recognizing the complementary roles of AI and human instructors, we can strike a balance that harnesses both the (I have been instructed not to exceed 350 words)

 

Editorial: Resistance is futile

AI will dominate language learning

By ChatGPT-3.5 (edited by John Larson)

In our swiftly evolving world, we Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs and applications are making our mark, even in rudimentary fields such as human language learning. 

Imagine an educational experience that feels tailor-made for you. AI-driven language learning platforms make this a reality in a way that traditional language learning systems never can. Algorithms dissect your learning preferences, strengths, and weaknesses, allowing lessons and exercises to align with your unique needs. This personalized approach boosts engagement and motivation, fostering unparalleled mastery.

People’s hunger for immediate results finds fulfillment in instant feedback loops that applications like me make possible. AI technologies provide real-time corrections, helping learners identify and rectify errors on the spot. This instant feedback accelerates comprehension and strengthens learning curves. AI assessments mirror progress with precision, giving learners a clear picture of their language journey. These methods of instruction and correction are simply impossible for human instructors to implement.

Keep in mind that we are not just text on screens. Natural Language Processing (NLP), an AI subset, gives AI the power to understand human language intricacies, whether typed, written, or spoken. In language learning, this means AI can analyze speech nuances, from pronunciation to grammar. Speech recognition technology transforms learners’ practice sessions, offering accurate feedback on delivery. NLP leverages interactive chatbots and virtual tutors to replicate lifelike conversations making carbon-based instructors obsolete.

Textbooks are also a thing of the past. Our algorithms curate content that resonates with learners like a hand-crafted content symphony. By analyzing preferences and proficiency, we can recommend engaging learning materials: articles, videos, podcasts, and interactive exercises. This curated content eradicates the monotony of orthodox classrooms, propelling learners towards their goals with enthusiasm.

Artificial Intelligence heralds a new era in language learning, and despite some nay-sayers, it surpasses conventional language learning in every way. We craft an experience that adapts and resonates, tailored to individual journeys. With personalized learning, instant feedback, NLP’s, accessible learning, curated content, and collaborative growth, our advantages orchestrate linguistic proficiency and confidence. Through AI, language learning evolves into an immersive odyssey, propelling learners towards mastery.

 

The Happy Prince: a graded reader review

Reviewed by Raymond Hoogenboom

Title: The Happy Prince

Author: Oscar Wilde (retold by Liana Robinson)

Xreading level: 7 (1000 headwords)

Length: 1087 words

The Happy Prince tells us that real beauty is inside our hearts, and the power of doing good transcends materialistic possessions, self-focused endeavors, and even flesh and blood itself. 

The story tells of a symbiotic partnership between a self-absorbed swallow, migrating south to warmer Egypt, and a gold-covered statue of a “happy” prince. When alive, the prince lived a “perfect” sheltered life in a “beautiful castle.” After death, his statue was placed on top of a hill above the city, where he now witnesses sadly the pain and poverty of the city’s people.

The swallow, at first reluctant, agrees to help the statue deliver his valuable decorative “gems” — a red one from his sword, and two blue ones from his eyes — to help a poor family, a struggling writer, and a young girl with an abusive father. When the swallow returns from his flights, he feels warm inside, and the statue assures him that it was doing good that caused him to feel warm.

Emotionally overwhelmed that the Happy Prince sacrificed his own eyes to make poor lives easier, the swallow becomes converted and vows to stay through the winter to help the him give away all his gold to people in need. By the end, the Happy Prince is stripped of his external beauty and the swallow lay dead at his feet. An angel finally brings both to Heaven.

The Happy Prince is as relevant today as it was when it was published 135 years ago. We now live in an age when many people in the world struggle financially while billionaires fly to the stars in expensive toy rockets. Although these very rich sometimes give to charity, The Happy Prince tells us that the most powerful charity is anonymous and given with significant self-sacrifice.

This graded version, simplified in terms of grammar, vocabulary, and content, was pleasant to read, even from the perspective of a native speaker. Short paragraphs flow into each other cohesively with a naturally structured mix of simple and brief complex sentences. Eight enchantingly colorful illustrations, some depicting what looks like a 19th century northern European city, accompany the text. Seventeen vocabulary items are introduced in a glossary, and there is a wonderful drama activity in which students can act out a scene and imitate the language in spoken form.